After the death of 18-year-old Nolan Xavier Wells, a new petition for “The Nolan Wells Rule” proposes clearer standards for how families are informed and included during missing-person and unexplained-death investigations.
A name is more than a name.
It is a life.
A family.
A story.
A legacy.
For the family of Nolan Xavier Wells, those words are not abstract.
On July 4, 2026, the 18-year-old traveled to Horn Island off the Mississippi Gulf Coast with friends. When the group returned, Nolan did not. His phone did.
He was reported missing that night, triggering a search involving law enforcement, volunteers and the U.S. Coast Guard. On the morning of July 6, Nolan’s body was recovered near the northwestern end of Horn Island. (CBS News)
What followed has left his family confronting grief alongside questions about what happened to their son.
Both the state medical examination and an independent autopsy ultimately listed Nolan’s cause and manner of death as “undetermined.” In September, a Jackson County grand jury declined to indict anyone, concluding that the evidence did not establish criminal wrongdoing and that the circumstances were consistent with drowning. Nolan’s family and its legal team have continued to challenge aspects of that conclusion and to seek additional clarity about his death. (People.com)
Out of the questions surrounding Nolan Xavier Wells’ death has emerged a broader proposal: the Nolan Wells Rule, a petition calling for clearer standards governing how families are informed and included during missing-person and unexplained-death investigations.
What should families reasonably be able to expect from the system when someone they love disappears or dies under circumstances that remain unexplained?
That question is at the heart of a new petition calling for what organizers are describing as the Nolan Wells Rule.
From One Family’s Questions to a Broader Standard
The petition is not an attempt to determine what happened to Nolan.
That question remains contested.
Instead, the proposed Nolan Wells Rule focuses on process: how families are communicated with, how investigative responsibilities are documented, how findings are explained and how unresolved questions can be raised.
The goal is to establish clearer and more consistent standards for missing-person and unexplained-death investigations so families know who is handling a case, what information can legally be shared and what happens when investigators decide to close or materially change the status of an investigation.
The petition proposes several protections.
A designated family liaison
Families would have an identified person responsible for providing consistent updates throughout an investigation.
In cases involving multiple law-enforcement agencies, medical examiners, forensic laboratories or other entities, simply knowing who to call can become difficult.
The proposed rule would make that responsibility explicit.
Family notification before major findings become public
Whenever legally permissible, immediate family members would be notified of significant investigative developments before those findings are released publicly.
For families already navigating trauma, learning consequential information about a loved one through social media, television or a press conference can deepen that pain.
The proposal seeks to make direct family communication part of the investigative process.
Knowing Who Is Responsible
The petition also calls for clear written documentation identifying:
- the lead investigative agency;
- potentially time-sensitive evidence;
- other agencies involved;
- forensic laboratories handling evidence; and
- medical examiners or other specialists participating in the case.
Complex investigations do not always belong to one agency.
But from a family’s perspective, that complexity should not mean confusion.
The proposed Nolan Wells Rule asks for a clearer road map of who is doing what.
Explaining Why a Case Changes—or Closes
One of the most consequential proposals involves how investigative conclusions are communicated.
The petition calls for families to receive, subject to legitimate legal and privacy restrictions, a written explanation of investigative findings and the basis for closing or materially changing the status of a case.
It also proposes giving families an opportunity to meet with investigators before closure or significant reclassification and receive a summary explaining:
- the findings;
- the limitations of the investigation; and
- significant questions that remain unanswered.
That does not mean every family will agree with every investigative conclusion.
It means they would have a clearer explanation of how authorities reached it.
“Undetermined” and “Closed” Are Not the Same Thing
One of the most important distinctions proposed by the petition concerns the word undetermined.
Medical and investigative conclusions answer different questions.
A medical examiner may be unable to determine conclusively how or why someone died. Separately, investigators may determine whether available evidence supports criminal charges or continued investigative activity.
The Nolan Wells Rule proposes that an undetermined cause or manner of death should not automatically be treated as synonymous with a closed investigation, particularly if credible new evidence later becomes available.
That distinction has particular relevance to the Wells case because both the state and independent autopsy findings left the cause and manner of Nolan’s death undetermined, even as the grand jury later determined that the evidence did not support criminal charges. (People.com)
Giving Families a Defined Way to Ask Questions
Grieving families often have questions.
Some can be answered.
Some cannot because of evidentiary, privacy or legal restrictions.
Others may remain unanswered because the evidence simply does not establish what happened.
The petition proposes a formal process allowing families to:
- request available case information;
- submit questions;
- raise unresolved concerns; and
- seek an appropriate review where one is available.
The purpose is not to guarantee a particular outcome.
No investigative standard can guarantee that every disappearance or unexplained death will ultimately be solved.
The purpose is to create a more predictable process for communication, documentation and review.
What Would It Take to Create a “National” Rule?
The petition describes the Nolan Wells Rule as a proposed national standard.
Turning those principles into enforceable policy would require decisions by lawmakers and public agencies about jurisdiction, funding, privacy, investigative independence and the respective roles of federal, state and local authorities.
Missing-person and death investigations can involve sheriffs, police departments, prosecutors, coroners, medical examiners, federal agencies and other entities, depending on the circumstances.
That means the specific mechanism for implementing such standards would need to be developed through legislation, administrative policy or some combination of the two.
The petition provides the framework.
The details of any eventual law or policy would require further public debate and legislative development.
Why Nolan’s Story Was Already Personal for Me
The day after the grand jury announcement in the Nolan Wells case, I found myself thinking less about legal terminology and more about my own children.
There were already countless videos, opinions and pieces of content moving across the internet about Nolan’s death. I watched one from a Central Mississippi business owner who described deciding to drive to Ocean Springs during that same Fourth of July weekend.
But my mind kept returning to McRae and Jaxon.
My boys have spent plenty of time in spaces where they were among the only Black boys in the classroom, on the team or in the group. As a father, that is something I notice even when they may not.
Then, in September, McRae said something to me that stopped me.
He told me he was glad we had made the decision for him to go to school in Pass Christian because, in his words, “there are a lot more brown people there.”
That stayed with me.
Maybe because my own childhood was different.
I attended an all-Black Lutheran elementary school in Trinity Gardens in Mobile. I later attended a magnet middle school intentionally designed to have a racially balanced student body. My high school was in Mobile’s Toulminville community and was 99.9% Black.
Then I came to Tougaloo College.
At Tougaloo, I never had to walk into a room and subconsciously count how many Black people were there.
I never had to wonder whether I was the only one.
There is a kind of comfort in that which you may not fully appreciate until you realize someone you love does not always have it.
And in the days after Nolan’s story began receiving national attention, something else happened that I will never forget.
One of the mothers from our baseball community reached out to my wife, Shalon.
This baseball mom is white.
She told her, essentially, “I hope you know I would never allow anything like this to happen to your babies. I love them like they are my own.”
She did not have to send that message.
Nobody asked her to.
But she felt compelled to make sure we knew where she stood.
I appreciated that more than she probably realized.
Because friendship is not only about enjoying one another when everything is comfortable.
Sometimes friendship means acknowledging that your friend may experience the world differently than you do.
Sometimes loving your neighbor requires listening closely enough to recognize a burden you have never personally had to carry.
And sometimes it requires saying out loud:
I see what you see. I care about what happens to you. And your children matter to me too.
That is part of what Nolan’s story has forced me to think about.
Not only what happened to one young man.
But what parents should be able to expect when they send their children into the world.
What families deserve when something goes terribly wrong.
And what responsibility the rest of us have when our neighbors are asking for answers.
That is why the idea behind the Nolan Wells Rule matters to me.
Not because any policy can erase what Nolan’s family has experienced.
It cannot.
But perhaps we can build a process that treats the next family with greater clarity, communication and dignity while they are facing the unimaginable.
Keeping Nolan’s Name Connected to Something Larger
Nolan Wells was more than the circumstances surrounding his death.
He was a son.
A student.
An athlete.
A friend.
People who knew him have described a young man whose life contained promise far beyond the headlines that followed July 4. Local reporting after his death highlighted his accomplishments as a student-athlete and the affection with which coaches, relatives and friends remembered him. (People.com)
That is important to remember.
Because when a death becomes a public case, sometimes the investigation begins to consume the person.
Documents replace memories.
Timelines replace personality.
Evidence replaces humanity.
The people who loved Nolan knew him before any of those things existed.
The proposed Nolan Wells Rule attempts to connect his name to a broader conversation about how families should be treated when they are navigating both profound loss and unanswered questions.
Whether policymakers ultimately adopt these specific proposals, modify them or pursue different reforms is a decision that will require public discussion.
But the questions behind the petition are worth examining:
- Who communicates with a family when multiple agencies are involved?
- How much information should families receive, and when?
- What explanation should accompany a decision to close a case?
- What happens when a death remains undetermined?
- And what process exists when families believe important questions remain?
Those questions extend beyond one family.
And Nolan’s name now sits at the center of them.
Readers can review the complete proposal and make their own decision about whether to support it.
A name is more than a name.
It is a life. A family. A story. A legacy.
Discover more from Black With No Chaser News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
